Thought Piece: The Use of Spreadsheets by Public Sector Organisations for Qualitative Tender Responses

The use of spreadsheets in public sector tendering has sparked extensive debate on LinkedIn and other professional platforms. Public sector bodies often rely on Microsoft Excel to manage qualitative responses to tenders. While spreadsheets offer simplicity and familiarity, they may fall short in addressing the complexities of modern tenders, especially in an era of digital transformation and AI-driven procurement processes.

This article explores why spreadsheets remain a popular tool, their advantages, and the challenges they present, particularly for bidding companies.


Why Are Spreadsheets Still Used in Public Sector Tendering?

Spreadsheets are widely utilized in public sector procurement across various industries. Here’s why:

1. Simplicity and Familiarity

Most users have basic Excel skills, reducing the need for additional training. Both public sector staff and suppliers are accustomed to working with spreadsheets.

2. Cost-Effectiveness

Budget constraints often limit the adoption of advanced tools. Spreadsheets are a low-cost alternative that eliminates the need for expensive software or custom development.

3. Flexibility

Spreadsheets can be adapted to meet diverse tender requirements, accommodating various input formats and data types.

4. Data Collection and Comparison

Structured data collection in spreadsheets allows evaluators to compare bids side by side using formulas, pivot tables, or other built-in tools.

5. Standardisation

Using a uniform spreadsheet template ensures all bidders respond in a consistent format, streamlining evaluation and fostering transparency.


Advantages of Spreadsheets for Public Sector Bodies

For procurement teams, spreadsheets provide notable benefits:

  • Standardisation: Ensures consistency in responses across all bidders.
  • Data Analysis: Automates numerical scoring, cost comparisons, and other calculations, saving time.
  • Transparency: Provides a clear and fair framework for evaluation.
  • Ease of Distribution: Easily shared via email or secure portals, simplifying communication.

Challenges Spreadsheets Pose to Bidding Companies

While spreadsheets serve procurement teams well, they create significant hurdles for bidding companies:

1. Complexity

Overly intricate spreadsheets with multiple tabs, conditional formatting, and complex formulas can confuse users. Errors in formulas often necessitate clarifications, prolonging the tender process.

2. Increased Risk of Errors

Manual data entry raises the risk of mistakes. A single misplaced figure can result in disqualification.

3. Inflexibility

Rigid spreadsheet formats can restrict nuanced responses. Companies may struggle to convey detailed or creative insights within predefined cells.

4. Lack of Visual Representation

Spreadsheets are text-heavy, limiting bidders’ ability to include visuals or graphics. Industries such as architecture or creative design, where visual impact is crucial, face challenges in showcasing their expertise effectively.

5. Technical Limitations

Not all bidders have the latest software or advanced Excel skills, putting smaller companies at a disadvantage.

6. Lack of Integration

Spreadsheets are standalone documents that do not integrate with modern procurement or CRM systems, leading to inefficiencies.


The Future of Tendering: Time for an Upgrade?

While spreadsheets have their merits, their limitations are becoming increasingly apparent in today’s fast-paced digital environment. For qualitative responses, they fall short in offering the flexibility, adaptability, and visual engagement required by modern tenders.

To address these challenges, public sector bodies should consider alternatives such as:

  • Tender Management Software: Tools that support dynamic response formats and integrate with other systems.
  • AI-Powered Solutions: Automated bid evaluations and real-time error checking.
  • Collaborative Platforms: Cloud-based systems enabling real-time updates and better communication between bidders and evaluators.

Conclusion: Are Spreadsheets Outdated for Tendering?

Spreadsheets remain a practical tool for standardising and analysing bids, particularly for numerical and pricing responses. However, their limitations make them less suited for the qualitative section of tenders. As procurement processes evolve, adopting modern digital tools that enhance flexibility, reduce errors, and support richer data formats will benefit both public sector bodies and bidding companies.

While spreadsheets may still have a place in tendering, the time is ripe to explore alternatives that can drive efficiency and innovation in public procurement.

Stuart Reed – Director, Courtney Tender Services Ltd and BidHelp.co.uk

Visit Courtneytenderservices.co.uk and BidHelp.co.uk for more information on how we can help you to success with bids and tenders